America’s Moms: Whether SCOTUS Acknowledges It or Not, We Deserve Emergency Health Care Whenever and Wherever We Need It
Lisa Lederer, 202/371-1996
“America’s moms wanted one thing from the U.S. Supreme Court in this case: A clear, unequivocal ruling that no pregnant person can be denied emergency health care because our health and our lives matter. Instead of providing that basic assurance, SCOTUS let us down yet again. Today’s action is a deep disappointment. Although women in Idaho have a reprieve, today’s action will put pregnant people in peril by creating potentially life-threatening confusion while we await additional litigation and whatever action extremists in Congress and future administrations may take.
“For nearly 40 years, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) has required most hospitals to give ‘necessary stabilizing treatment’ to people facing emergencies, including those who are pregnant. It is foundational to a civilized, compassionate society and has served our country well. Pregnant people facing medical emergencies sometimes need emergency abortion care and we are grateful the Biden/Harris administration clarified that EMTALA protects this care.
“But SCOTUS refused to confirm that today and left open the possibility that state politicians will force doctors to deny emergency abortion care. It is truly horrifying that three U.S. Supreme Court justices seem ready to allow states to imprison doctors who provide emergency abortion care to patients whose health is at grave risk.
“The rulings SCOTUS has issued on reproductive health over the last two years have devalued and jeopardized moms’ lives, caused immense harm, and exacerbated our already devastating maternal health crisis. Moms will not forget which lawmakers and jurists are responsible for the catastrophe we’re facing today.”